Differences of Post-Placement Bone Implant Contact (BIC) Value of Dental Implant Coated and Not Coated With Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)

Thalib, Bahruddin and Machmud, Edy and Dharmautama, Mochammad and Surya, Ervina Sari and Asmawati, Asmawati and Hasyim, Rafikah (2017) Differences of Post-Placement Bone Implant Contact (BIC) Value of Dental Implant Coated and Not Coated With Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP). Global Journal of Health Science, 10 (2). p. 11. ISSN 1916-9736

[thumbnail of 72503-267862-3-PB.pdf] Text
72503-267862-3-PB.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The success of a dental dental implant treatment focuses on a phenomenon called osseointegration. Evaluation of Bone Area (BA) and Bone-Dental implant Contact (BIC) through histomorphometric analysis is the most widely used parameter to measure osseointegration. The aim of this study was to see post-placement Bone Dental implant Contact (BIC) value of dental implant coated and not coated with PRP.

MATERIALS & METHODS: This study was an experimental laboratory conducted at Laboratory of Veterinary Faculty, Hasanuddin University. The sample was baby buck rabbit, aged 4-8 months old, weight 1500–2000 gram, divided into 2 groups each group consist of 12 rabbit, control group not coated with PRP and treatment group coated with PRP. Data analysis using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the mean BIC values and the 20% increase in BIC values in LP1, LP2 and LP3 between treatment and control group on day 0, 3, 7, and 14.

CONCLUSIONS: There was a difference in the average of post-placement BIC value of dental implant coated and not coated with PRP.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: GO STM Archive > Medical Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@gostmarchive.com
Date Deposited: 27 Apr 2023 06:33
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2024 04:10
URI: http://journal.openarchivescholar.com/id/eprint/684

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item